⚠️ Strike Alert: Teachers could walk out as early as Monday, February 9. Check SFUSD.edu for updates →

Updated Feb 4, 2026

The Contract Dispute, Explained

A parent-friendly breakdown of the SFUSD factfinding report: what each side wants, what the panel recommends, and what it means for your family.

Strike Vote
97.6%
Students
50K
Teachers & Staff
8,900
Schools
122
Without Contract
7+ mo
Since July 1
Last Strike
1979

The core question

What does each side want?

After nearly a year of failed negotiations, a neutral panel has recommended a compromise. The union representative only "concurred in part."

IssueUnion WantsDistrict OfferedPanel Recommends
Salary Increase9% over 2 years (4.5%/yr)4% over 2 years (2%/yr)6% over 2 years (3%/yr)
Family Health BenefitsFully-paid coverage ($14M/yr)Use parcel tax funds (outside contract)Parcel tax as temporary bridge
Special EducationWorkload model ($22M/yr)Keep caseload model (status quo)Pilot program at select schools
Class SizesHard limits (not goals)Keep as goals (~$5M to change)Status quo (keep as goals)
Staffing (Nurses, Counselors)At every school ($82.1M/yr)Status quoStatus quo
Sanctuary ProtectionsWritten into contractNot a bargaining subjectJoint resolution (not in contract)
AI in SchoolsSpecific contract languageWorking group to studyStatus quo (working group)

Who agreed to what?

The panel issued its recommendations on February 4, 2026. The union's partial concurrence signals the recommendations may not be accepted.

Cheryl A. Stevens
Neutral Chairperson
Concurred
Elizabeth Mori
District Representative
Concurred
Angela Su
Union Representative
Concurred in Part

Source: Factfinding Report, p.19

Following the money

What does it cost?

Every proposal has a price tag. Here's what each side's demands would cost, and what the district says it can afford.

💰 Cost of Union Proposals

📊 District Financial Position

Cost of living context

The panel looks at whether raises keep up with inflation. Here's how California CPI has changed:

2.40%2020-21
6.60%2021-22
5.69%2022-23
3.41%2023-24
2.60%2024-25
2.30%2025-26 COLA

Source: Factfinding Report, p.15-16

The consultant controversy

The union argues SFUSD spends too much on outside contractors. The panel recommends reallocating these funds. But the report doesn't include specific dollar amounts for total consultant spending.

Central admin spending vs. peer districts83% higher Mission Local
Total operating expenses vs. peer median45% higher Mission Local
Failed payroll system (EMPower)$35M GovTech
Replacement system (Frontline)$20M + $2M/yr GovTech

⚠️ If schools close during a strike

SFUSD would lose $7-10 million per day in state penalties for ceasing instruction.

Source: SF Standard, Feb 3, 2026

The details

Key issues in the dispute

Special Education

The panel acknowledged that special education teachers face "overwhelming demands" as student needs become more complex. SFUSD has more than 6,800 special ed students, about 14% of enrollment.

Panel's recommendation

Create a pilot program at 3 elementary schools, 1 middle school, and 1 high school to test workload-based models before district-wide implementation.

Source: Factfinding Report, p.10, 13-14

Sanctuary Protections

The union wanted contract language designating SFUSD as a "sanctuary district" with commitments to support immigrant and unhoused families, including legal services, housing assistance, and employment support.

Context from the report

The panel cited the "outrageous attacks on immigrant communities" and specifically mentioned the detention of five-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his father.

Source: Factfinding Report, p.16

However, the panel ruled this is not a "mandatory subject of bargaining" and shouldn't be in the contract. They recommend a joint resolution instead.

Salary Competitiveness

The parties dispute how SFUSD salaries compare to other districts:

Union's analysis (8 local districts)SFUSD ranks 5th Factfinding Report, p.7
District's analysis (10-year earnings)SFUSD ranks 2nd Factfinding Report, p.8

The panel noted: "The challenge here is reconciling the differences in the analysis of the data since the parties rely on mostly the same districts." (Factfinding Report, p.9)

What happens next

Strike timeline

March 2025
Contract negotiations begin
Factfinding Report, p.2
July 1, 2025
Previous contract expires; staff begin working without a contract
Factfinding Report, p.2
Oct 10, 2025
Parties jointly declare impasse after 10 bargaining sessions
Factfinding Report, p.2
Nov 10, 2025
Mediation ends in impasse
Factfinding Report, p.2
Jan 23, 2026
Factfinding hearing held
Factfinding Report, p.2
Jan 29-31
Strike authorization vote: 97.6% of 5,202 union members vote YES
Feb 4, 2026
TODAY: Factfinding report released
Factfinding Report, p.19
~Feb 9, 2026
EARLIEST POSSIBLE STRIKE DATE (union must give 48 hours notice)

Methodology

Sources

Every number links to an official public document or news report. The factfinding report is the primary source; external sources provide additional context.

Official Documents

News Coverage

Stay informed: Sign up for updates at sfusd.edu

Prepare: Identify backup childcare, check employer leave policies, connect with other parents

Get involved: Attend school board meetings, join your school's Site Council or PTA

Share: The more parents who understand the numbers, the better the conversation